Method for differentiating complex matrix functions in digital antenna array response models

Authors

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.3103/S0735272724060025

Keywords:

Khatri-Rao product, face-splitting product, Slyusar product, digital antenna array, amplitude frequency response, AFR, I/Q demodulation

Abstract

The paper proposes a method for differentiating the Khatri–Rao products of several matrix functions used in digital antenna array (DAA) response models, which are matrix expressions depending on the same vector of unknowns. The product of block matrices of values of amplitude-frequency responses (AFR) of several series-connected digital filters (quadrature I/Q demodulators, decimating filters, fast Fourier transform (FFT) filters, or so-called frequency filter banks, etc.), as well as the AFR of antenna elements or several stages of DAA receiver channels.

The procedure for the factorization of matrix derivatives of the specified type is considered. For compact notation of differentiation results, it is proposed to use matrix operations of block sum, column, and row diagonalization. For example, we present the results of differentiation of the Khatri–Rao products consisting of two and three matrices depending on one vector of variables, and the variants of factorization of such derivatives.

The proposed differentiation method is generalized to the case of a combination in one expression of different types of derivatives with respect to the block vector of the Khatri–Rao product, when the elements of not all, but several block matrices depend on the same block of unknowns.

The factorization procedure allows us to simplify the differentiation process and reduce calculations when forming the Fisher information matrix to analyze the potential accuracy of signal parameter estimation in DAA.

References

  1. V. I. Slyusar, “End matrix products in radar applications,” Izv. VUZ Radioelektronika, vol. 41, no. 3, pp. 71–75, 1998.
  2. V. I. Slyusar, “New operations of matrix products for application of radars,” in IEEE MTT/ED/AP West Ukraine Chapter DIPED - 97. Direct and Inverse Problems of Electromagnetic and Acoustic Theory (IEEE Cat. No.97TH8343), 1997, pp. 73–74, doi: https://doi.org/10.1109/DIPED.1997.710918.
  3. V. I. Slyusar, “A family of face products of matrices and its properties,” Cybern. Syst. Anal., vol. 35, no. 3, pp. 379–384, 1999, doi: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02733426.
  4. V. I. Slyusar, “Generalized face-splitting matrix products in models of digital antenna arrays with nonidentical channels,” Izv. Vyss. Uchebnykh Zaved. Radioelektronika, vol. 46, no. 10, pp. 15–26, 2003.
  5. V. I. Slyusar, “Fisher information matrix for models of systems based on face-splitting matrix products,” Cybern. Syst. Anal., vol. 35, no. 4, pp. 636–643, 1999, doi: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02835859.
  6. V. I. Slyusar, “The method of analyzing potential accuracy of multi-coordinate radar measurements,” Radioelectron. Commun. Syst., vol. 43, no. 1, pp. 68–75, 2000.
  7. А. I. Мinochkin, V. I. Slyusar, V. I. Rudakov, Theoretical Bases of Military-Technical Researches. Vol. 2. Kyiv: Granmna, 2012.
  8. M. Barat, M. Karimi, M. A. Masnadi-Shirazi, “Direction of arrival estimation in vector-sensor arrays using higher-order statistics,” Multidimens. Syst. Signal Process., 2020, doi: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11045-020-00734-z.
  9. Z. Xiaofei, Z. Ming, C. Han, L. Jianfeng, “Two-dimensional DOA estimation for acoustic vector-sensor array using a successive MUSIC,” Multidimens. Syst. Signal Process., vol. 25, no. 3, pp. 583–600, 2014, doi: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11045-012-0219-y.
  10. A. Agarwal, A. Kumar, M. Agrawal, F. Fauziya, “Higher order statistics based Direction of Arrival estimation with single Acoustic Vector Sensor in the under-determined case,” in OCEANS 2016 MTS/IEEE Monterey, OCE 2016, 2016, doi: https://doi.org/10.1109/OCEANS.2016.7761028.
  11. L. N. Ribeiro, S. Schwarz, M. Rupp, A. L. F. de Almeida, J. C. M. Mota, “A low-complexity equalizer for massive MIMO systems based on array separability,” in 2017 25th European Signal Processing Conference (EUSIPCO), 2017, pp. 2453–2457, doi: https://doi.org/10.23919/EUSIPCO.2017.8081651.
  12. Y. Wakamatsu, H. Yamada, Y. Yamaguchi, “MIMO Doppler radar using Khatri-Rao product virtual array for indoor human detection,” IEICE Trans. Commun., vol. E99.B, no. 1, pp. 124–133, 2016, doi: https://doi.org/10.1587/transcom.2015ISP0029.
  13. B. Yao, Z. Dong, W. Zhang, W. Wang, Q. Wu, “Degree-of-freedom strengthened cascade array for DOD-DOA estimation in MIMO array systems,” Sensors, vol. 18, no. 5, p. 1557, 2018, doi: https://doi.org/10.3390/s18051557.
  14. J. Konishi, H. Yamada, Y. Yamaguchi, “Optimum element arrangements in MIMO radar using Khatri-Rao product virtual array processing,” IEICE Commun. Express, vol. 7, no. 11, pp. 407–414, 2018, doi: https://doi.org/10.1587/comex.2018XBL0104.
  15. A. Zinchenko, V. Slyusar, N. Korolyuk, E. Korshets, “The method of open space selection of signals for Redcom systems,” in 2019 3rd International Conference on Advanced Information and Communications Technologies (AICT), 2019, pp. 1–5, doi: https://doi.org/10.1109/AIACT.2019.8847826.
  16. Z.-Q. He, X. Yuan, “Cascaded channel estimation for large intelligent metasurface assisted massive MIMO,” IEEE Wirel. Commun. Lett., vol. 9, no. 2, pp. 210–214, 2020, doi: https://doi.org/10.1109/LWC.2019.2948632.
  17. G. T. de Araujo, A. L. F. de Almeida, R. Boyer, “Channel estimation for intelligent reflecting surface assisted MIMO systems: a tensor modeling approach,” IEEE J. Sel. Top. Signal Process., vol. 15, no. 3, pp. 789–802, 2021, doi: https://doi.org/10.1109/JSTSP.2021.3061274.
  18. F. Wen, C. Mao, G. Zhang, “Direction finding in MIMO radar with large antenna arrays and nonorthogonal waveforms,” Digit. Signal Process. A Rev. J., vol. 94, pp. 75–83, 2019, doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.dsp.2019.06.008.
  19. Z. Zhu, F. Latorre, G. G. Chrysos, V. Cevher, “Controlling the complexity and Lipschitz constant improves polynomial nets,” in 10h International Conference on Learning Representations (ICLR), 2022, uri: https://infoscience.epfl.ch/record/292143/files/LC_and_RC_of_PNN-8.pdf.
  20. T. D. Ahle, J. B. T. Knudsen, “Almost optimal tensor sketch,” Mathematics, Computer Science, 2019.
  21. T. D. Ahle et al., “Oblivious sketching of high-degree polynomial kernels,” in Proceedings of the Fourteenth Annual ACM-SIAM Symposium on Discrete Algorithms, Philadelphia, PA: Society for Industrial and Applied Mathematics, 2020, pp. 141–160.
  22. B. Iskender, Y. Bresler, M. L. Klasky, “Dynamic tomography reconstruction by projection-domain separable modeling,” in 2022 IEEE 14th Image, Video, and Multidimensional Signal Processing Workshop (IVMSP), 2022, pp. 1–5, doi: https://doi.org/10.1109/IVMSP54334.2022.9816298.
  23. C. G. Khatri, C. R. Rao, “Solutions to some functional equations and their applications to characterization of probability distributions,” Sankhyā Indian J. Stat. Ser. A, vol. 30, no. 2, pp. 167–180, 1968, uri: http://www.jstor.org/stable/25049527.
  24. S. Miron et al., “Tensor methods for multisensor signal processing,” IET Signal Process., vol. 14, no. 10, pp. 693–709, 2020, doi: https://doi.org/10.1049/iet-spr.2020.0373.
  25. B. O. Karpenko, Y. A. Yakornov, M. Y. Kolomytsev, G. L. Avdyeyenko, “Application of mathematical apparatus of face-splitting matrix products for describing optimal vector of weight coefficients of adaptive antenna array with non-identical processing channels,” Collect. Sci. Work. Mil. Inst. Taras Shevchenko Natl. Univ. Kyiv, no. 30, pp. 34–39, 2011.
  26. N. D. Sidiropoulos, R. S. Budampati, “Khatri-Rao space-time codes,” IEEE Trans. Signal Process., vol. 50, no. 10, pp. 2396–2407, 2002, doi: https://doi.org/10.1109/TSP.2002.803341.
  27. D. Rocha, G. Favier, C. Fernandes, “Closed-form receiver for multi-hop MIMO relay systems with tensor space-time coding,” J. Commun. Inf. Syst., vol. 34, no. 1, pp. 50–54, 2019, doi: https://doi.org/10.14209/jcis.2019.5.
  28. W. Freitas, G. Favier, A. L. F. de Almeida, “Generalized Khatri-Rao and Kronecker space-time coding for MIMO relay systems with closed-form semi-blind receivers,” Signal Process., vol. 151, pp. 19–31, 2018, doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sigpro.2018.04.005.
  29. P. H. de Pinho, C. Maria F. K. B., G. Favier, J. P. C. L. da Costa, A. L. F. de Almeida, J. P. A. Maranhao, “Semi-supervised receivers for MIMO systems with multiple Khatri-Rao coding,” in 2019 13th International Conference on Signal Processing and Communication Systems (ICSPCS), 2019, pp. 1–7, doi: https://doi.org/10.1109/ICSPCS47537.2019.9008759.
  30. A. Magalhaes, P. Gomes, A. Almeida, “Semi-supervised receiver for MIMO systems with mixed Khatri-Rao-Kronecker coding,” in Anais de XXXVIII Simpósio Brasileiro de Telecomunicações e Processamento de Sinais, 2020, doi: https://doi.org/10.14209/SBRT.2020.1570661676.
  31. P. Forster, G. Ginolhac, M. Boizard, “Derivation of the theoretical performance of a tensor MUSIC algorithm,” Signal Process., vol. 129, pp. 97–105, 2016, doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sigpro.2016.05.033.
  32. V. Slyusar, P. Serdiuk, “Synthesis method of procedure for odd-order I/Q demodulation based on replacing multistage with equivalent single-stage demodulation schemes,” Radioelectron. Commun. Syst., vol. 63, no. 5, pp. 273–280, 2020, doi: https://doi.org/10.3103/S0735272720050064.
  33. C. R. Rao, M. B. Rao, Matrix Algebra and Its Applications to Statistics and Econometrics. World Scientific, 1998, doi: https://doi.org/10.1142/3599.
  34. T. Kollo, Matrix Derivative for Multidimensional Statistics. Tartu: University of Tartu, 1991.
  35. V. I. Slyusar, “Synthesis of algorithms of measuring M sources distance in additional strobing of analog-to digital conversion readings,” Izv. VUZ Radioelektronika, vol. 39, no. 5, pp. 55–62, 1996.
  36. C. D’Andrea, S. Buzzi, M. Lops, “Communications and radar coexistence in the massive MIMO regime: uplink analysis,” IEEE Trans. Wirel. Commun., vol. 19, no. 1, pp. 19–33, 2020, doi: https://doi.org/10.1109/TWC.2019.2939816.
  37. V. I. Slyusar, V. L. Buryachok, “Model of signals for digital antenna array with mutual coupling on the basis of face-splitting matrises product,” in Conference Proceedings on Mathematical Methods in Electromagnetic Theory (MMET), 1998, pp. 424–425.
  38. V. A. Varyukhin, V. I. Pokrovskii, V. F. Sakhno, “Modified likelihood function in the problem of determining the angular coordinates of sources using antenna array,” Dokl. AN SSSR, vol. 270, no. 5, pp. 1092–1094, 1983.
  39. V. I. Slyusar, “Neural networks models based on the tensor-matrix theory,” Probl. Adv. Micro- Nanoelectron. Syst. Dev., pp. 23–28, 2021, doi: https://doi.org/10.31114/2078-7707-2021-2-23-28.

Downloads

Published

2024-09-25

Issue

Vol. 67 No. 9 (2024): Circuit and Signal Theory

Section

Research Articles