Acoustooptic methods and tools for measuring parameters of optoelectronic devices
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.3103/S0735272722060048Keywords:
acoustooptic processor, AOP, acoustooptic modulator, AOM, laser, photodetector, PD, optoelectronics, power flux density, inertiaAbstract
The paper considers the schematic diagram and operation algorithm of acoustooptic processor (AOP), the main assemblies of which are acoustooptic modulator (AOM), laser and photodetector (PD). Using the mathematical simulation, it has been shown that the signal at the AOP output contains information about the characteristics of AOM, laser and PD. The possibility of investigating the characteristics of one of the above assemblies with the known parameters of the other two by using the AOP response on determinate input action in the form of rectangular pulse has been established. A brief review of the known methods for measuring the parameters of PD and laser is presented including certain limitations of their applications. The theoretical substantiation of the possible use of AOP peculiarities for measuring the PD inertia parameters is presented. A formula for the calculation of the AOP output response to rectangular input action is proposed that makes it possible to estimate separately the time of optical beam crossing by the elastic wave packet and PD inertia. In addition, it has been proved that the configuration of cross-section of laser beam and the distribution law of power flux density in this beam could be determined on the basis of AOP peculiarities. To this end, a pulse of short duration is fed to the AOP input. Results of theoretical investigations were validated by numerical calculations and confirmed by experimental measurements.
References
S. B. Bychkov, I. V. Volkov, A. I. Glazov, I. S. Korolev, K. B. Savkin, N. P. Khatyrev, “Method for measuring the speed parameters of photodetectors,” Izmer. Tekhnika, no. 8, pp. 36–42, 2020, doi: https://doi.org/10.32446/0368-1025it.2020-8-36-42.
M. Wang et al., “Self-referenced frequency response measurement of high-speed photodetectors through segmental up-conversion based on low-speed photonic sampling,” Opt. Express, vol. 27, no. 26, p. 38250, 2019, doi: https://doi.org/10.1364/OE.382798.
V. E. Lozhnikov, A. I. Dirochka, “Modulation method for measurement of parameters of photodetectors at the wavelength of 10.6 um for heterodyne applications,” Prikl. Fiz., no. 3, pp. 51–57, 2016, uri: https://applphys.orion-ir.ru/appl-16/16-3/PF-16-3-51.pdf.
K. Zotov et al., “Matrix of piezoelectric resonators for registration of spatial distribution of laser radiation,” in Optical Sensors 2019, 2019, p. 92, doi: https://doi.org/10.1117/12.2521562.
F. V. Bulygin, I. V. Goryainova, A. A. Kovalev, K. D. Maramzin, “Measurement of the laser beam intensity distribution using optical tomography,” Tech. Phys., vol. 52, no. 7, pp. 907–910, 2007, doi: https://doi.org/10.1134/S1063784207070122.
C. C. Davis, Lasers and Electro-Optics. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2013, doi: https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9781139016629.
A. I. Chizhikov, K. B. Yushkov, V. Y. Molchanov, “Acousto-optical modulator based on NaBi(MoO4)2 crystal,” in Fourteenth School on Acousto-Optics and Applications, 2019, p. 30, doi: https://doi.org/10.1117/12.2541046.
J. N. Lee, A. Vanderugt, “Acoustooptic signal processing and computing,” Proc. IEEE, vol. 77, no. 10, pp. 1528–1557, 1989, doi: https://doi.org/10.1109/5.40667.
A. Pierson, C. Philippe, “Acousto-optic interaction model with mercury halides (Hg2Cl2 and Hg2Br2) as AOTF cristals,” in International Conference on Space Optics — ICSO 2018, 2019, p. 219, doi: https://doi.org/10.1117/12.2536139.
X. Li, Optoelectronic Devices. Cambridge University Press, 2009, doi: https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511581144.
R. A. Ahmadov, A. R. Hasanov, R. A. Hasanov, A. Q. Huseynov, “Transient response of an acoustooptic delay line and its applications,” Phys. Bases Instrum., vol. 9, no. 1, pp. 71–78, 2020, doi: https://doi.org/10.25210/jfop-2001-071078.
R. A. Hasanov, “Photodetectors for acousto-optic delay lines,” Instruments Syst. Monit. Control. Diagnostics, no. 12, pp. 31–36, 2015, uri: http://pribor.tgizd.ru/en/arhiv/14710.