Open Access Open Access  Restricted Access Subscription Access
Multipulse homogeneous detection performance of the derived version CATM(2, 2) CFAR scheme

Performance predominance of a new strategy for CFAR processors over the N-P model in detecting four degrees of freedom χ2 fluctuating targets

Mohamed Bakry El Mashade


Modern radars have adopted adaptive processing techniques to mitigate the deleterious effects of unwanted clutter and jammer. In this situation, the CFAR algorithms play a vital role in achieving the heterogeneous detection of fluctuating targets. In this regard, while the CA-CFAR processor has the top homogeneous performance, the OS and TM techniques have been suggested to provide robust estimates of the threshold in heterogeneous situations. In order to simultaneously exploit the merits of CA and OS or TM processors, some their hybrid versions have been recently introduced. They are termed as CAOS and CATM models. Practically, the frequency diversity between noncoherent sweeps is widespread in actual radar systems. Additionally, the pulse integration strategy is often used in radar systems to improve the target signal-to-noise ratio and correspondingly the system detection performance. For this reason, this paper is focusing on analyzing these new models in the case where the radar receiver noncoherently integrates M-pulses to handle its detection. Closed-form expression is derived for their nonhomogeneous performance. The tested as well as the spurious targets are assumed to follow χ2-distribution with four degrees of freedom in their fluctuations. Our simulation results reveal that the new version CATM exhibits a homogeneous performance that outweighs that of the classical Neyman-Pearson (N-P) procedure, which is employed as a baseline comparison for other strategies in the field of adaptive detectors.


adaptive processors; clutter; interference; χ2-distribution; SWIII and SWIV models; noncoherent integration; target multiplicity environments

Full Text:



WEINER, M.A. “Detection probability for partially correlated chi-square targets,” IEEE Trans. Aerospace Electronic Systems, v.24, n.4, p.411-416, 1988. DOI:

BARKAT, M.; HIMONAS, S.D.; VARSHNEY, P.K. “CFAR detection for multiple target situations,” IEE Proc. F - Radar Signal Processing, v.136, n.5, p.193-209, 1989. DOI:

EL MASHADE, M.B. “Detection performance of the trimmed-mean CFAR processor with noncoherent integration,” IEE Proc. Radar, Sonar Navig., v.142, n.1, p.18-24, 1995. DOI:

NAGLE, Daniel T.; SANIIE, Jafar. “Performance analysis of linearly combined order statistic CFAR detectors,” IEEE Trans. Aerospace Electronic Systems, v.31, n.2, p.522-533, 1995. DOI:

HAN, D.-S. “Detection performance of CFAR detectors based on order statistics for partially correlated chi-square targets,” IEEE Trans. Aerospace Electronic Systems, v.36, n.4, p.1423-1429, 2000. DOI:

FARROUKI, A.; BARKAT, M. “Automatic censoring CFAR detector based on ordered data variability for nonhomogeneous environments,” IEE Proc. - Radar Sonar Navig., v.152, n.1, p.43-51, 2005. DOI:

EL MASHADE, M.B. “Analysis of cell-averaging based detectors for χ2 fluctuating targets in multitarget environments,” J. Electron. (China), v.23, n.6, p.853-863, 2006. DOI:

LAROUSSI, T.; BARKAT, M. “A performance comparison of two time diversity systems using CMLD-CFAR detection for partially-correlated chi-square targets and multiple target situations,” Proc. of 14th European Signal Processing Conf., 4-8 Sept. 2006, Florence, Italy. IEEE, 2006, p.4-8, URI:

EL MASHADE, M.B. “Performance analysis of OS structure of CFAR detectors in fluctuating target environments,” PIER C, v.2, p.127-158, 2008. DOI:

MAGAZ, B.; BELOUCHRANI, A.; HAMADOUCHE, M. “A new adaptive linear combined CFAR detector in presence of interfering targets,” PIER B, v.34, p.367-387, 2011. DOI:

CAI, Long; MA, Xiaochuan; XU, Qi; LI, Bin; REN, Shiwei. “Performance analysis of some new CFAR detectors under clutter,” J. Computers, v.6, n.6, p.1278-1285, 2011. DOI:

WANG, W.Q. Radar Systems: Technology, Principles and Applications. Nova Science Publishers, Inc, 2013.

IVKOVIĆ, Dejan; ANDRIĆ, Milenko; ZRNIĆ, Bojan. “A new model of CFAR detector,” Frequenz, v.68, n.3-4, p.125-136, 2014. DOI:

IVKOVIĆ, Dejan; ANDRIĆ, Milenko; ZRNIĆ, Bojan. “False alarm analysis of the CATM-CFAR in presence of clutter edge,” Radioengineering, v.23, n.1, p.66-72, 2014. URI:

EL MASHADE, M.B. “Partially-correlated χ2 targets detection analysis of GTM-adaptive processor in the presence of outliers,” Int. J. Image, Graphics Signal Processing, v.7, n.12, p.70-90, 2014. DOI:

IVKOVIĆ, Dejan; ANDRIĆ, Milenko; ZRNIĆ, Bojan; OKILJEVIĆ, Predrag; KOZIĆ, Nadica. “CATM-CFAR detector in the receiver of the software defined radar,” Sci. Tech. Rev., v.54, n.4, p.27-38, 2014. URI:

AHMED, S. “Novel noncoherent radar pulse integration to combat noise jamming,” IEEE Trans. Aerospace Electronic Systems, v.51, n.3, p.2350-2359, 2015. DOI:

IVKOVIĆ, Dejan; ANDRIĆ, Milenko; ZRNIĆ, Bojan. “Detection of very close targets by fusion CFAR detectors,” Sci. Tech. Rev., v.66, n.3, p.50-57, 2016. DOI:

MACHADO-FERNANDEZ, J.R.; MOJENA-HERNANDEZ, N.; BACALLAO-VIDAL, J.C. “Evaluation of CFAR detectors performance,” Iteckne, v.14, n.2, p.170-178, 2017. DOI:

ISLAM, M.M.; HOSSAM-E-HAIDER, M. “Detection capability and CFAR loss under fluctuating targets of different Swerling model for various gamma parameters in RADAR,” Int. J. Advanced Computer Science Applications, v.9, n.2, p.90-93, 2018. DOI:

EL MASHADE, M.B. “Heterogeneous performance analysis of the new model of CFAR detectors for partially-correlated χ2-targets,” J. Systems Engineering Electronics, v.29, n.1, p.1-17, 2018. DOI:

© Radioelectronics and Communications Systems, 2004–2020
When you copy an active link to the material is required
ISSN 1934-8061 (Online), ISSN 0735-2727 (Print)
tel./fax +38044 204-82-31, 204-90-41